Check this out, from Ace of Spades.
Today’s bit of unhinged anti-Palin hackery goes as follows:
Palin grew up in Idaho and there were lots of racists there. Palin lives in Alaska and there aren’t very many black people there. DO THE MATH PEOPLE! CONNECT THE DAMN DOTS!
After spending 7 paragraphs listing every white supremacy group and racist one can think of that might have been with 1,000 miles of Sarah Palin at some point in her life, this lefty jackass is forced to admit there’s no actual, you know record of Palin being a racist or anything. Not that that stops her from demanding that questions be asked.
There is no evidence that Palin was ever affiliated with white-supremacist groups during her years in Idaho or at home in Alaska. On the other hand, the beliefs of ultraconservative, evangelical churches like her family's come dangerously close to those of the Christian Identity movement of those years. Likewise, Palin's husband was a member of a political party whose members favored secession for Alaska, suggesting an affiliation with radical antistatism.
Perhaps somewhere on the record, Palin has publicly condemned the radical politics of her region. But it is hard to know where she stands on issues of race, equality and diversity. Thus it is high time to review the cultural ideals and models of the radical rurals from the Great White Northwest and find out for sure where Gov. Palin stands.
You’ve heard of “guilty while driving black” of course. I gather this is “guilty while living in the Pacific Northwest”.
If only we could find out if say, and I’m just spitballing here, if Obama had any connection to radical racists, perhaps even one connected to a church of some sort. And as for ‘radial antistatism’, do you suppose Obama ever knew anyone who, and again I’m just thinking out loud here, wanted to overthrow the US government by force?
Of course, questions must be asked, even if there’s no actual evidence. Of Palin naturally. You see if there was actual evidence in Obama's case, the MSM wouldn’t ask questions, they’d have to work hard to hide that evidence. How hard would they have to work? As hard as if Elizabeth Edwards’ feelings were depending on it.
We've won folks. When the mainstream media sells out this much in favor of a candidate, that candidate has no chance. Everyone can plainly see the agenda, and now it is over.
Recent Comments