Comments on The New Deal 2.0?TypePad2008-07-07T23:45:43ZScotthttp://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/tag:typepad.com,2003:http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/the-new-deal-20/comments/atom.xml/Scott Martin commented on 'The New Deal 2.0?'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00e552560c42883400e5538dc44a88332008-07-08T02:52:52Z2008-07-08T02:52:52ZScott Martinhttp://www.conservatismtoday.comWe recovered from Carter, so I don't totally agree with you Dana, but where you have me is on the...<p>We recovered from Carter, so I don't totally agree with you Dana, but where you have me is on the Supreme Court. I think we'd rebound nicely from the other stuff under a Reagan 2.0, but I'd be reduced to praying for the continued health and well being of Justices Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, Alito and even Kennedy. </p>
<p>You're probably right. </p>Dana commented on 'The New Deal 2.0?'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00e552560c42883400e5538dbdfb88332008-07-08T02:42:49Z2008-07-08T02:42:49ZDanahttp://commonsensepoliticalthought.comNo, I'm not thinking the way you are. Total Democratic control would be a disaster from which we would never...<p>No, I'm not thinking the way you are. Total Democratic control would be a disaster from which we would never recover. We'd get two or three rotten Supreme Court appointments, which could have implications for thirty years. Our taxes would go sky-high again, all to give more money to people who don't want to work. Government spending would skyrocket, and government program just never seem to end.</p>