<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Comments on Starbucks: A Study in Liberal Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu/comments/rss.xml" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:32:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
			<title>Nick Tabor commented on &#39;Starbucks: A Study in Liberal Failure&#39;</title>
			<link>http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html?cid=125514908#comment-6a00e552560c42883400e553ef033c8834</link>
			<dc:creator>Nick Tabor</dc:creator> 
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html?cid=125514908#comment-6a00e552560c42883400e553ef033c8834</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:40:23 -0700</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Failed employees? I doubt any unprofitable store was closed because of &amp;quot;failed&amp;quot; employees. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And keep in mind that the slightly increased prices that would coincide with a corporation&amp;#39;s manufacturing its goods in the United States (as opposed to sweatshops in underdeveloped countries) would also do much to provide domestic jobs.  Looking at it this way, Wal*Mart&amp;#39;s hardly doing us a favor.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bill commented on &#39;Starbucks: A Study in Liberal Failure&#39;</title>
			<link>http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html?cid=121397764#comment-6a00e552560c42883400e553a7e5d78834</link>
			<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> 
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html?cid=121397764#comment-6a00e552560c42883400e553a7e5d78834</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:43:08 -0700</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Contrast this with a company much-despised by liberals, like oh, say, Walmart. Walmart  actually provides value to its customers, reducing their costs for daily necessities...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right.  At the cost of people working in communist countries for $2 per day.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your outrage is B.S.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>swag commented on &#39;Starbucks: A Study in Liberal Failure&#39;</title>
			<link>http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html?cid=120950446#comment-6a00e552560c42883400e5539e6c528834</link>
			<dc:creator>swag</dc:creator> 
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.conservatismtoday.com/my_weblog/2008/07/starbucks-a-stu.html?cid=120950446#comment-6a00e552560c42883400e5539e6c528834</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:34:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know about you, but I wish I had just a fraction of Starbucks&amp;#39; profits -- even if I don&amp;#39;t like their coffee and politics aside.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- ph=1 -->
<!-- nhm:from_kauri -->

